Comments on: Future of Voting in Massachusetts, Part III: Rand Wilson for State Auditor http://www.jessekb.com/2006/09/28/future-of-voting-in-massachusetts-part-iii-rand-wilson-for-state-auditor/ Progressive Commentary from Cambridge, Mass. Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:18:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Joe’s Amazing Technicolor Weblog » Blog Archive » The rest of the upcoming election http://www.jessekb.com/2006/09/28/future-of-voting-in-massachusetts-part-iii-rand-wilson-for-state-auditor/#comment-8484 Joe’s Amazing Technicolor Weblog » Blog Archive » The rest of the upcoming election Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:00:51 +0000 http://www.jessekb.com/2006/09/28/future-of-voting-in-massachusetts-part-iii-rand-wilson-for-state-auditor/#comment-8484 [...] The brand-new Working Families party endorsed Rand Wilson for Auditor. Fascinating interview with Wilson here. [...] […] The brand-new Working Families party endorsed Rand Wilson for Auditor. Fascinating interview with Wilson here. […]

]]> By: Christine http://www.jessekb.com/2006/09/28/future-of-voting-in-massachusetts-part-iii-rand-wilson-for-state-auditor/#comment-72 Christine Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:25:31 +0000 http://www.jessekb.com/2006/09/28/future-of-voting-in-massachusetts-part-iii-rand-wilson-for-state-auditor/#comment-72 Mr. Wilson, While filling out my absentee ballot, I got down to the Auditor category and thought, "What is this Working Families party designation?" I searched the internet finding this article and some other sites on Question #2 and took a look at randwilson.org. I felt the need to reply in regards to "Not so focused on actually winning the Auditor’s position, Wilson will be designated on the ballot as “Working Families” and is campaigning to build support for Question 2 and recognition for an official Working Families Party in Massachusetts." While I support your effort of spreading the word of alternative parties (I'm proof it's working), I despise your means. Honestly, if you have no intention of becoming the state auditor you should not be running, regardless of the amount of votes you think will be cast for you. If you are simply running to promote your stand on Ballot Question #2, I highly abhor your tactics and lack of regard for civic responsibility. I support the creation of alternative parties and am a firm believer in the union system, though you must find a better way to promote these initiatives without disgracing the Massachusetts' election. DeNucci has won my vote and Rand Wilson has won my scrutiny and skepticism of the entire "Working Families" party. Sincerely, Christine Mr. Wilson,

While filling out my absentee ballot, I got down to the Auditor category and thought, “What is this Working Families party designation?” I searched the internet finding this article and some other sites on Question #2 and took a look at randwilson.org.

I felt the need to reply in regards to “Not so focused on actually winning the Auditor’s position, Wilson will be designated on the ballot as “Working Families” and is campaigning to build support for Question 2 and recognition for an official Working Families Party in Massachusetts.”

While I support your effort of spreading the word of alternative parties (I’m proof it’s working), I despise your means. Honestly, if you have no intention of becoming the state auditor you should not be running, regardless of the amount of votes you think will be cast for you. If you are simply running to promote your stand on Ballot Question #2, I highly abhor your tactics and lack of regard for civic responsibility. I support the creation of alternative parties and am a firm believer in the union system, though you must find a better way to promote these initiatives without disgracing the Massachusetts’ election.

DeNucci has won my vote and Rand Wilson has won my scrutiny and skepticism of the entire “Working Families” party.

Sincerely,
Christine

]]>